HORSEPLOP.COM

General Category => Harness Racing => Topic started by: Parked on January 22, 2025, 07:17:11 PM

Title: USTA rule proposal of 35 starts a year. Your opinion ?
Post by: Parked on January 22, 2025, 07:17:11 PM
That is for 4 year olds and up. 
Title: Re: USTA rule proposal of 35 starts a year. Your opinion ?
Post by: Harness racer on January 22, 2025, 08:05:59 PM
They will allow younger horses unlimited starts?  Seems stupid to not make it a rule for everyone.  Although I don’t agree with it at all.  If you look, most horses that fall or die during a race aren’t over raced.  They are lame and the track vet doesn’t pay attention.  Don’t make new rules, just hold the vets accountable for not doing their job.
Title: Re: USTA rule proposal of 35 starts a year. Your opinion ?
Post by: Brown jug on January 22, 2025, 08:17:00 PM
if its a rule, any rule  coming from the usta than i disapprove of it
Title: Re: USTA rule proposal of 35 starts a year. Your opinion ?
Post by: Parked on January 22, 2025, 10:25:54 PM
20 starts for 2 year olds, 25 for 3 year olds, 35 for aged horses.
Title: Re: USTA rule proposal of 35 starts a year. Your opinion ?
Post by: JT on January 23, 2025, 07:54:14 AM
If that actually becomes a rule the Clegg's may go out of business
Title: Re: USTA rule proposal of 35 starts a year. Your opinion ?
Post by: darnoldrocks on January 23, 2025, 10:47:47 AM
Harness Racer  ...  "If you look, most horses that fall or die during a race aren’t over raced.  They are lame."

 How many were B. lame and C. fell due to being A. over raced??
A + B = C
Title: Re: USTA rule proposal of 35 starts a year. Your opinion ?
Post by: Brown jug on January 23, 2025, 10:56:47 AM
or had something illegal in their system forcing them to go faster than their body can handle
Title: Re: USTA rule proposal of 35 starts a year. Your opinion ?
Post by: Harness racer on January 23, 2025, 11:24:27 AM
or had something illegal in their system forcing them to go faster than their body can handle

I think this is more the issue than too many starts.
Title: Re: USTA rule proposal of 35 starts a year. Your opinion ?
Post by: okdfool on January 23, 2025, 11:43:17 AM
or had something illegal in their system forcing them to go faster than their body can handle

This is more the problem then anything else, most the starts the young ones get are going are like training trips they would go during the week anyway 🙄
Title: Re: USTA rule proposal of 35 starts a year. Your opinion ?
Post by: rainman2 on January 23, 2025, 06:58:36 PM
They will allow younger horses unlimited starts?  Seems stupid to not make it a rule for everyone.  Although I don’t agree with it at all.  If you look, most horses that fall or die during a race aren’t over raced.  They are lame and the track vet doesn’t pay attention.  Don’t make new rules, just hold the vets accountable for not doing their job.

You need less races for the younger ones to make sure they don’t go lame, breakdown, etc.

Common sense dictates the following:

2 year old.  10 starts
3 year old.  25 starts
4+ year olds. 35 starts

Because of the today’s speed, horses will only last so long. 

Title: Re: USTA rule proposal of 35 starts a year. Your opinion ?
Post by: Winners Win on January 23, 2025, 09:35:52 PM
This a stupid rule.  I can see a 2 year old cap but to cap age horses is for show.  I have seen horses with 50+ starts a year race to retirement age of 15 sound.  Once size never fits all.
Title: Re: USTA rule proposal of 35 starts a year. Your opinion ?
Post by: rainman2 on January 23, 2025, 09:40:38 PM
This a stupid rule.  I can see a 2 year old cap but to cap age horses is for show.  I have seen horses with 50+ starts a year race to retirement age of 15 sound.  Once size never fits all.

Can they??   The answer is yes.

But how many actually get that far???
Title: Re: USTA rule proposal of 35 starts a year. Your opinion ?
Post by: Kole Hanover on January 23, 2025, 09:54:59 PM
20 starts for 2 year olds, 25 for 3 year olds, 35 for aged horses.

 20 is way too many for a 2 yr old if going any kind of speed

 
Title: Re: USTA rule proposal of 35 starts a year. Your opinion ?
Post by: Hambletonian46 on January 24, 2025, 08:05:10 AM
Like many other do-goody initiatives, it tries to simplify an issue to a generic standard.

Number of races is only one factor, and should be much less of a factor for standardbreds as opposed to the runners. How hard they are trained, how hard they are raced, what kind of condition they are kept in, these all play a role too.  And some horses are just flat out more durable, anybody with skin in the game knows this. So 35 starts for one horse may have the same impact as 15 starts for another.

If they want to do something useful, make sure that detailed health records are maintained for every horse and have an independent vet screen each horse pre race. I know most horsemen are not in favor of this, because of the "racing sound" issue where some horses warm up a little gimpy but work out of it--these would all likely be scratched. But if you were looking for a way to preserve the horses, this would be better than an arbitrary number of starts limit.

Title: Re: USTA rule proposal of 35 starts a year. Your opinion ?
Post by: Late to the Paddock on January 24, 2025, 05:38:52 PM
I'm all for it because there are too many unscrupulous people who do not put the welfare of the horse first. I also think this rule is another anti-HISA effort by USTA, like "look look were doing something on our own, we don't need HISA."
Title: Re: USTA rule proposal of 35 starts a year. Your opinion ?
Post by: Winners Win on January 24, 2025, 07:21:40 PM
Some stables put big training miles in during the week.  Some people go around the track from the 8 hole with less effort than those training miles.   Starts is only part of the equation. 
Title: Re: USTA rule proposal of 35 starts a year. Your opinion ?
Post by: LUCPARK on January 24, 2025, 07:49:22 PM
20 starts for 2 year olds, 25 for 3 year olds, 35 for aged horses.

12 to 14  starts  max for  two yr olds
Title: Re: USTA rule proposal of 35 starts a year. Your opinion ?
Post by: Parked on January 25, 2025, 09:24:33 AM
You could vote yes, no or no reply.
There was a place for comments.
I agree with 12 for 2 year olds. No limit on 3 year olds and aged horses. 
Breeders don’t want to limit # of starts as the want the babies to break down so they can sell more yearlings. 
We all know the day before the vote all reply's will be deleted , Williams and Faraldo will pass or reject as they want. 
Did anyone else receive a survey ?
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal