13th - 3 Born to Dance 5,4,8

Landed on the 4,5 and 5 in the finale, GL!

Meadowlands (H)                169.60
   Race 13    5.00    WIN    4+5    NaN.00
   Race 13    4.00    EX    BX+4+5    8.00
   Race 13    2.00    TRI    4+5 / 4+5 / 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10    32.00
   Race 13    1.00    TRI    4+5 / 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10 / 4+5    16.00
   Race 13    1.00    TRI    1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10 / 4+5 / 4+5    16.00
   Race 13    4.00    DBL    4+5 / 5    8.00
   Race 13    1.00    DBL    1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10 / 5    10.00
   Race 13    0.10    SPR    4+5 / 4+5 / 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10 / 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10    11.20
   Race 13    0.10    SPR    4+5 / 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10 / 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10 / 4+5    11.20
   Race 13    0.10    SPR    4+5 / 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10 / 4+5 / 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10    11.20
   Race 14    10.00    WP    5    20.00
   Race 14    1.00    EX    BX+5 / 1+2+4+5+6+7+8+9+10    16.00

Oops I hit a nerve

Now the woke
 Firing on all cylinders

It’s over trump don’t fckin pay

He destroys

I need a bomb too.

Have an all in the pick 4 it's either 2 bux or 600 

Good news is you got P4 for .40. Bad news is the 4 was pounded.
Try again tomorrow.

Lucpark, this has been debunked but Republicunts keep up with the lies
Both — but in different situations, and the accusations refer to different events.

🔹 Joe Biden

He was accused (by critics) of “giving Iran $6 billion” in 2023.
What actually happened: the administration agreed to allow $6 billion of Iran’s own frozen oil money (held in South Korea) to be transferred to a restricted account in Qatar as part of a prisoner exchange deal. The funds were limited to humanitarian purchases like food and medicine.

Critics framed this as “paying Iran,” but it was not U.S. taxpayer money.

🔹 Barack Obama

He was accused in 2016 of “giving Iran $150 billion” as part of the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA).
In reality:

The $150 billion figure referred to Iran’s own frozen assets being unfrozen under the nuclear agreement.

There was also a separate $1.7 billion settlement payment related to a decades-old legal dispute over pre-1979 arms purchases. That money also came from funds Iran had originally paid.

Critics portrayed both as “cash payments,” especially because part of the $1.7 billion was delivered in physical currency (due to banking sanctions at the time).

✅ Bottom Line

Obama was accused regarding the nuclear deal and frozen assets (~$150B figure).

Biden was accused regarding the $6B prisoner exchange arrangement.

In both cases, the money involved was Iran’s previously frozen funds, not new U.S. aid money.


Yes — the claim Biden “sent” or “gave” billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to Iran is false and has been fact-checked and debunked by multiple independent sources. The confusion mostly comes from misrepresenting arrangements involving Iran’s own frozen assets, not a direct payment by the U.S. government.

Here’s the clear, factual breakdown:

📌 1. It Was Iran’s Money, Not U.S. Taxpayer Money

The funds people talk about — figures like $6 billion, $10 billion, or even $16 billion — were Iranian assets that had been frozen in foreign banks under sanctions. That money came from Iran’s own oil sales and other revenues that were blocked after sanctions were applied. It was not U.S. government funds or taxpayer dollars.

📌 2. The “Release” or “Unfreezing” Was Part of Diplomatic Agreements

What happened in recent years under the Biden administration were negotiated arrangements to let Iran access some of its own frozen money under strict conditions, often tied to:

a prisoner exchange, or

humanitarian purposes (like buying food or medicine),
and not as a blanket cash gift.

These funds were moved to specially monitored accounts (for example, in Qatar) and often cannot be “spent” freely — and in some cases had not even been accessed by Iran months after the agreements.

📌 3. Independent Fact-Checkers Say Claims of “Giving Billions to Iran” Are Misleading

Fact-checking organizations like Snopes and FactCheck.org have found that:

claims saying the U.S. gave Iran $16 billion or more are misleading,

the posts or social media claims often distort what actually happened, and

none of these deals involve U.S. funds being handed over as a gift.

📌 4. Historical Context Matters

Some confusion also comes from older controversies (like a 2016 payment related to a long-running claims settlement), but those were settlements of Iranian claims against the U.S. and involved Iran’s own money, not fresh U.S. taxpayer payments.