41
Harness Racing / Re: Ford must resign
« Last post by andrew on Today at 08:34:36 PM »da taint seems a lil riled tonight
musta missed his mornin bagel

prob forgot how its spelled

|
41
Harness Racing / Re: Ford must resign« Last post by andrew on Today at 08:34:36 PM »da taint seems a lil riled tonight musta missed his mornin bagel ![]() prob forgot how its spelled ![]() 42
Harness Racing / Re: Ford must resign« Last post by Trigger on Today at 08:33:15 PM »Another homo taking it up the ass! I ain’t surprised! Did FATSO's wife take it up the ass from SB ![]() 43
Political Roundtable / Re: A "Bloodbath" at the midterms« Last post by andrew on Today at 08:32:22 PM »Canadians find aspects of daily life frustrating, such as high taxes, formalities, and the need to remove shoes indoors. Economic development is also uneven between regions
44
Harness Racing / Re: Ford must resign« Last post by ScrapeThePaint on Today at 08:31:13 PM »I agree too. Another homo taking it up the ass! I ain’t surprised! 45
Political Roundtable / Re: A "Bloodbath" at the midterms« Last post by gogasgoboom on Today at 08:28:36 PM »Burn baby burn.
![]() 46
Harness Racing / Re: Ford must resign« Last post by seen2much on Today at 08:26:14 PM »Day 501, Ford must resign. agreeI agree too. 47
Harness Racing / Re: Ford must resign« Last post by ScrapeThePaint on Today at 08:20:09 PM »you seem to enjoy that gay talk more than the average person That’s because you are a flaming fuckface who will agree with any of the men who fuck you in the ass you gay fuck! Keep agreeing so they keep fucking you! 48
Political Roundtable / 2015 EDT Trump 'revenge tour'« Last post by rainman2 on Today at 08:15:04 PM »BREAKING: Grand jury REFUSES TO INDICT Cassidy Hutchinson, handing Trump’s DOJ another HUMILIATING DEFEAT in its revenge campaign.
Donald Trump’s Justice Department spent years being pushed to punish the woman who told America what happened with Trump on January 6. Then it walked into a D.C. grand jury room and walked out empty-handed, as grand jurors in the nation’s capital continue to reject the DOJ’s attempts to prosecute the people whom the vindictive president considers his enemies. According to The Washington Post, a federal grand jury in Washington rejected the Justice Department’s attempt to indict former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson over her 2022 testimony to the House January 6 committee. In a brief court appearance Tuesday, a Justice Department lawyer told a magistrate judge that the grand jury “had not concurred” on a proposed indictment. Two people familiar with the matter told the Post he was referring to Hutchinson. Here’s why that’s a big deal. Grand juries almost never say no. Prosecutors only need to convince a majority of jurors that there’s probable cause a crime was committed, a famously low bar. As the old saying goes, a prosecutor could indict a ham sandwich without a hell of a lot of trouble. Speaking of sandwiches: D.C. grand jurors also refused to indict the man who threw a Subway sandwich at a National Guardsman. In February, another D.C. grand jury refused to indict six Democratic lawmakers over a video reminding troops they must refuse illegal orders. Now Hutchinson joins the list of the embarrassing failures by Trump’s DOJ, which keeps losing to ordinary citizens who can see exactly what’s going on. And this one was strange from the start. The case was presented by the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, an unusual choice for a false-statements investigation, the Post reports. It followed a referral from two of Trump’s loudest allies in Congress, Reps. Jim Jordan and Barry Loudermilk, who claimed her testimony was false. Hutchinson was just 25 when she testified in 2022, and 13 million people watched. She said Trump urged supporters to march on the Capitol knowing they were armed. She also relayed what another aide told her: that Trump grabbed at the steering wheel of his SUV and lunged at the head of his security detail when told he couldn’t go to the Capitol. That limo story is the part Republicans have attacked for years. The Secret Service agent who drove the vehicle later disputed it, and no other witness corroborated it, though several said Trump was visibly angry. But Hutchinson always said she was recounting what she was told, and a grand jury evidently didn’t see a crime in that. The Justice Department didn’t respond to the Post’s request for comment. The message from D.C. jurors couldn’t be clearer: testifying to Congress about the president is not a crime, no matter how much he hates what you said. Trump wanted a prosecution. He got another rejection slip. 49
Harness Racing / Re: Susan Oakes and Chuck Pompey brilliant !!« Last post by The Answer on Today at 08:11:50 PM »Pelling was training Dandy for over a month in Lexington. Not sure why that’s illegal.
50
Political Roundtable / 2010 EDT Women and the GOP« Last post by rainman2 on Today at 08:11:12 PM »BREAKING: AMEN! Rep. Jamie Raskin says that future historians will say that this "miserable period" really started when MAGA voters chose to ignore all of the women that Trump sexually harassed and abused.
Our country went off the cliff after that... "Her mother sided with the rapist stepfather and Vivek Ramaswamy made an ad about it. JD Vance didn't hesitate or flinch in the same news cycle that it comes out," MS NOW's Nicolle Wallace said, setting the stage for the discussion. "He doubles down. He said, run the ad harder, run the ad longer, put more money behind it. Trump said the same. What does it say about the culture around these men?" Ramaswamy's vile ad featured the mother of his Democratic opponent Amy Acton urging voters to reject her daughter at the ballot box. He dumped millions into the ad, despite the fact that Acton's mother previously sided with Acton's stepfather, who raped her. Vivek and Vance's defense of the ad has been disgusting, and proves that these Republican men view women as nothing more than disposable objects. "Well, it's completely contaminated and toxic, and you know, when historians look back on this miserable period of our history, they might say that the first problem was disregarding all of those women who told us back in 2016 that they had been sexually harassed or assaulted by Donald Trump," said Raskin. "But he got elected even after he was adjudicated civilly responsible for sexually penetrating and attacking E. Jean Carroll in a dressing room in a department store in New York City," he continued. "And there are there are reports in the report that we just released, the Democrats on the Judiciary Committee. "There are accounts by specific survivors and victims which very much resemble this, that is at a kind of public event or public place, cornering someone in something like a dressing room or a hotel room and then sexually attacking them," said Raskin. "And that's precisely what Beatrice Keul says in her account of what took place back then." A new report released by Democratic staff on the House Judiciary Committee revealed yesterday that former Miss Switzerland Beatrice Keul alleged that Trump raped her at the Plaza Hotel in New York in 1993. Not only that, but Jeffrey Epstein introduced himself to her as Trump's best friend and offered to arrange for her to travel to Mar-a-Lago. The report states that the two predators used the "Donald J. Trump American Dream Pageant" as a "hunting ground" to prey on young women and girls. The new allegation, as horrifying as it is, is unfortunately unsurprising. We have long known that Trump is an unrepentant rapist in addition to being a pedophile. His voters chose to ignore those facts because they were so excited by his racist rhetoric and cruelty. Now, they're paying the price because (surprise, surprise!), the sociopathic, serial rapist isn't actually interested in improving the lives of average Americans. He's getting richer while the country burns. "So look, the evidence is certainly enough to justify an investigation," said Raskin of Keul's accusation. "It's overwhelmingly likely it's enough to justify going to a grand jury to see if a grand jury agrees. But it certainly is not reconcilable in any way with sweeping the whole matter under the rug. And I just want to thank these survivors, these victims of these terrible events when they were mostly girls. Some of them were young women, but mostly they were girls. They were minors." "For coming forward and hanging tough and saying this really happened and the country's got to pay attention to it," he went on. "So my responsibility is the ranking member in the House Judiciary Committee and our responsibility as Democrats on the Judiciary Committee is to make certain that the Department of Justice is not able to sweep this under the rug." "And we also show evidence in this report about how the White House was actually calling all the shots and was essentially dictating or editing the statement that there was nothing to see here and that there was no basis for further investigation," added Raskin. "And it's just scandalous that that took place. In fact, the White House had to order them to use Department of Justice and FBI letterhead because they didn't want to. Nobody wanted to be associated with this extraordinary act of cover up in the service of Donald Trump and against the service of justice and the rule of law." |
|