Author Topic: question about a positive and returned purse money  (Read 3015 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

dinkadoo

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 5630
question about a positive and returned purse money
« on: August 01, 2023, 06:22:56 PM »
So a horse gets a check - checks sent out, 5% to driver and 5% to trainer.

Horse has a positive and the ruling states that the purse money needs returned by however many days.

Does the money returned -- include the 5% earned by the driver ? Or does the owner or trainer have to return that 5% ?


LUCPARK

  • Living Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 57281
  • HES A GOOD GUY ,FAMILY MAN AND A CHRISTIAN
Re: question about a positive and returned purse money
« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2023, 06:25:14 PM »
im pretty sure it does not
REAL AMERICANS DONT TAKE A KNEE

Chips N Salsa

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1230
Re: question about a positive and returned purse money
« Reply #2 on: August 01, 2023, 07:05:56 PM »
Only in some cases.  Lexington doesn't take it back from drivers.  Some tracks do it just depends.  It's all according to who it is as well.  If your a top ten driver your probably not getting charged.  I know Georgie Brennan never had to give back all the Lou Pena money.

Fuguzzi

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3104
Re: question about a positive and returned purse money
« Reply #3 on: August 01, 2023, 07:12:25 PM »
Direct quote from George Brennan to me and a buddy circa 2006, "If they ever find out what Pena's using, I'm all done"


Mailbox Money

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1231
Re: question about a positive and returned purse money
« Reply #5 on: August 01, 2023, 08:13:40 PM »
The driver percentage is best worked out between the trainer and owner. The last thing you want to do is piss off your driver! If a trainer races regularly, then they will debit his account. At least this has been my experience with it.

 

shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • Sweet: FATSO has no control over himself, you take the power away, his empowerment to do evil, then you're left with a nothing of a being.
    Today at 11:56:26 AM
  • Ignorance Is Bliss: Still a classic  ngc3 [link]
    Today at 11:46:57 AM
  • Ignorance Is Bliss: Pacer 2 find a new pharmacy yet?  ngc3. [link]
    Today at 11:38:05 AM
  • Sweet: Thankfully Mike is on the case, along with NYCLASS and other protestors.  When any side has no represenation, then they're screwed, because money and power rule of ethics i.e. the horse racing industry and how it cannot self sustain.  Pacer 2 and G are evil, nuts too!  tmbz1
    Today at 11:12:54 AM
  • dougie: IIB, I think the mayor will sign the bill if it reaches his desk. The optics on this issue is bad for the horse carriage industry. Animal activists are adept to using the media to enlist horror and anger by the public.
    Today at 10:56:32 AM
  • Ignorance Is Bliss: It's now a bill with city council. Public hearings will be scheduled then the council votes on it. If passed it's sent to the Mayor to sign into law. He has already said he's in. Marte just took over, Bob Holden is the actual author of the bill who retired last year.
    Today at 10:52:34 AM
  • dougie: IIB, I have been reading some of the work Councilman Marte has been doing on this issue. I think he might be successful with passing the 'Ryders Law" Bill this time around. The image of the horse dead on the street has even been seen here everywhere. If the animal activists can get this on the ballot, who knows how the vote will go.
    Today at 10:44:33 AM
  • Ignorance Is Bliss: You peaked at typing on Horseplop. Bravo. I was invited, that's Councilman Chris Marte next to me, good guy. [link]
    Today at 10:27:25 AM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal