Author Topic: Bring Back A-1, B-2, C-3 Classifications  (Read 4771 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Fuguzzi

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3104
Re: Bring Back A-1, B-2, C-3 Classifications
« Reply #15 on: September 07, 2023, 12:32:54 PM »
Imagine if PJ was given this power at Saratoga  73cv.2
Defrank built....

Hambletonian46

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 352
Re: Bring Back A-1, B-2, C-3 Classifications
« Reply #16 on: September 08, 2023, 07:32:20 AM »
There were far far less oddds on horses under the old clsssification system then in the NWx$xStarts system. And for the most part it was fair. Of course you had folks trying to milk a connection by running second or third each week; it was always fun when a horse got bumped up without having won a race at the lower classification. And it did give al ot of power to the racing secretaries, which I am sure pissed off the horsemen. But it was a  lot more digestibkle for the less experienced fans than the current systems.

But the current NWx$xStarts is just a joke. It incentivizes horsemen to run out of the money in order to get a lower classification. It also does not account for purse level differences between tracks. And using the Trackmaster ratings...just ridiculous.

Less competitive racing may be good for the horsemen but it does not help the bettors and in the end the health of the industry. I made it out to the Meadowlands and Saratoge Tbreds this summer and as an old guy the thing that surprised me the most in comparison to the days of my mispent youth was the number of completely crap races filled with crap horses. These are two of what should be the premiere meets in the country and the quality of the betting product was not there. The Meadowlands especially, 30 years ago there seemed to be multiple good horses in each race, now it is like trying to decipher who is the least worst.

Fuguzzi

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3104
Re: Bring Back A-1, B-2, C-3 Classifications
« Reply #17 on: September 08, 2023, 09:06:22 AM »
There were far far less oddds on horses under the old clsssification system then in the NWx$xStarts system. And for the most part it was fair. Of course you had folks trying to milk a connection by running second or third each week; it was always fun when a horse got bumped up without having won a race at the lower classification. And it did give al ot of power to the racing secretaries, which I am sure pissed off the horsemen. But it was a  lot more digestibkle for the less experienced fans than the current systems.

But the current NWx$xStarts is just a joke. It incentivizes horsemen to run out of the money in order to get a lower classification. It also does not account for purse level differences between tracks. And using the Trackmaster ratings...just ridiculous.

Less competitive racing may be good for the horsemen but it does not help the bettors and in the end the health of the industry. I made it out to the Meadowlands and Saratoge Tbreds this summer and as an old guy the thing that surprised me the most in comparison to the days of my mispent youth was the number of completely crap races filled with crap horses. These are two of what should be the premiere meets in the country and the quality of the betting product was not there. The Meadowlands especially, 30 years ago there seemed to be multiple good horses in each race, now it is like trying to decipher who is the least worst.

Fuguzzi

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3104
Re: Bring Back A-1, B-2, C-3 Classifications
« Reply #18 on: September 08, 2023, 09:07:43 AM »
Fantastic post. perfect desription of the current failed system and why the old ABC was far better, for the bettor, especially. Good job, Hambo!

theokodjak26

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1158
Re: Bring Back A-1, B-2, C-3 Classifications
« Reply #19 on: September 08, 2023, 11:53:43 AM »
I agree with Fug. Hambo wrote a great position paper.

Fuguzzi

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3104
Re: Bring Back A-1, B-2, C-3 Classifications
« Reply #20 on: September 08, 2023, 11:58:55 AM »
 tmbz1
I agree with Fug. Hambo wrote a great position paper.
tmbz1 to my friend, Kodjak

 

shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • Trigger: Hoosier 11th, stretch accident, a horse gets it;s head hit and or run over bike sulky.  Horse looked motionless.  :P
    April 02, 2026, 10:05:34 PM
  • Trigger: We need more future wagers like the KYD.  What's better than your horse losing, betting and losing on a horse that doesn't race at all!  ngc3
    April 02, 2026, 05:44:18 PM
  • Trigger: US AG, Pam Bondi - Fired! A year!  Shit Show!  ;D
    April 02, 2026, 05:19:50 PM
  • Trigger: Sorry Mike you did the heavy lifting and listened, those two make me annoyed and sick a few minutes in  ngc3
    April 02, 2026, 12:25:22 PM
  • Ignorance Is Bliss: Hear Guarino say he never took and know it's his turn to take back??? ngc3
    April 02, 2026, 12:06:22 PM
  • Trigger: Exactly, he cheated and scored and was back in the hole with the wiseguys before you could blink, fucking hero and great fans!  ngc3
    April 02, 2026, 11:25:58 AM
  • Ignorance Is Bliss: How many millions did he say he got fixing races? Now he needs handouts??? Only in harness racing.
    April 02, 2026, 11:17:50 AM
  • Trigger: Larry Rolla a living cheating cunt, $50K...Mike's phone, someone's better be ringing, alerting, preventing, someone who wnats out of the cycle of abuse...don't ever be so cowardly feeling you can't be involved in helping vulnerable, abused, dying horses and be a harness racing participant and fan!
    April 02, 2026, 10:53:37 AM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal