Author Topic: Betting Half Mile Tracks  (Read 2537 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

theokodjak26

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1162
Betting Half Mile Tracks
« on: September 14, 2023, 10:54:43 AM »
Half mile racing has always been my favorite to attend. I always enjoyed all the sights, smells and the close proximity to the action. I mean without cameras how can anyone over 50 make out the horse numbers at a mile track? That being said the big negative of half mile is betting.The percentage of winning favorites has always been higher than mile tracks but now it makes betting a real bad choice. According to the USTA stats half mile favs are coming in at 47% to almost 50%. Add to that that the pools at some of these tracks are pathetically low. I believe there are two reasons for these trends. The first is the shortage of horses which leads to fields that often only have 5-6 horses. Secondly race secretaries are establishing conditions that favor the bigger trainers or just to fill a race. Whether odds on horses win or not, the number of them is much higher than what existed in the 70’s and 80’s. So between the field sizes and pools this is why the Meadowlands is a much better betting proposition than places like Yonkers, Monticello, Saratoga etc. The Meadowlands percentage of favs is approximately 10%-13% lower with much bigger pools, even with all the amateur drivers. Any thoughts?

gogasgoboom

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 520
  • 8647
Re: Betting Half Mile Tracks
« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2023, 11:07:27 AM »
Biggest problem is the number of wire to wire winners. Boring. Rarely does the leader falter. I find simply playing numbers works as well as anything as the results are very post position oriented.
« Last Edit: September 14, 2023, 11:10:58 AM by gogasgoboom »
"I love the poorly educated" - DJT   |   "I could say the stupidest things and you'd clap" - DJT

Fuguzzi

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3104
Re: Betting Half Mile Tracks
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2023, 11:17:09 AM »
Biggest problem is the number of wire to wire winners. Boring. Rarely does the leader falter. I find simply playing numbers works as well as anything as the results are very post position oriented.
These days percentages of winners on big tracks almost the same as small. Look it up. Speed killed this game more than anything by stripping value and turning off the gambler.

 

shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • Dingus: Actually, going 3’ wider than the horse on the rail is equal to 2 lengths/turn or 6 lengths on a 5/8.
    Today at 09:22:50 PM
  • Calhoun: 150 -->>146 -->>20 lengths ... lolololol.   ngc3 ngc3 ngc3
    Today at 08:34:49 PM
  • Kirby's Ace: Wow!
    Today at 06:27:52 PM
  • Trigger: No one wants to admit if you leave from the 7 hole get blindswitched end up mi-back of pack on the outside, stay on the outside 3 turns on a 5/8's track and go 150 flat, you ran a 146 equivelant from rail to wire. 8)
    Today at 05:43:34 PM
  • JT: Glad they pulled through for ya Dougie  tmbz1.  It's his last year and he is all in
    Today at 02:37:16 PM
  • dougie: Congrats JT! I bet them yesterday. I loved watching Aaron run. LOL!
    Today at 12:46:57 PM
  • dougie: I meant rooting! LOL!!!!!
    Today at 11:05:42 AM
  • dougie: JT.....i'm rotting for your Steelers.
    Today at 11:04:13 AM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal