Author Topic: Betting Half Mile Tracks  (Read 1904 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

theokodjak26

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1158
Betting Half Mile Tracks
« on: September 14, 2023, 10:54:43 AM »
Half mile racing has always been my favorite to attend. I always enjoyed all the sights, smells and the close proximity to the action. I mean without cameras how can anyone over 50 make out the horse numbers at a mile track? That being said the big negative of half mile is betting.The percentage of winning favorites has always been higher than mile tracks but now it makes betting a real bad choice. According to the USTA stats half mile favs are coming in at 47% to almost 50%. Add to that that the pools at some of these tracks are pathetically low. I believe there are two reasons for these trends. The first is the shortage of horses which leads to fields that often only have 5-6 horses. Secondly race secretaries are establishing conditions that favor the bigger trainers or just to fill a race. Whether odds on horses win or not, the number of them is much higher than what existed in the 70’s and 80’s. So between the field sizes and pools this is why the Meadowlands is a much better betting proposition than places like Yonkers, Monticello, Saratoga etc. The Meadowlands percentage of favs is approximately 10%-13% lower with much bigger pools, even with all the amateur drivers. Any thoughts?

gogasgoboom

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 279
  • ETTD 8647
Re: Betting Half Mile Tracks
« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2023, 11:07:27 AM »
Biggest problem is the number of wire to wire winners. Boring. Rarely does the leader falter. I find simply playing numbers works as well as anything as the results are very post position oriented.
« Last Edit: September 14, 2023, 11:10:58 AM by gogasgoboom »
FUCK AMERICA   |   MAKE AMERICA FIRST BECOME AMERICA ALONE   |   FUCK AMERICANS

Fuguzzi

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3104
Re: Betting Half Mile Tracks
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2023, 11:17:09 AM »
Biggest problem is the number of wire to wire winners. Boring. Rarely does the leader falter. I find simply playing numbers works as well as anything as the results are very post position oriented.
These days percentages of winners on big tracks almost the same as small. Look it up. Speed killed this game more than anything by stripping value and turning off the gambler.

 

shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • Sweet: Uh oh, I'm now seeing Napoleon Solo and Incredibolt coming for him....I need anti-pschotic meds  ngc3
    Today at 12:50:26 PM
  • Sweet: I was too busy study the race while he posted it 20 min before  ngc3
    Today at 12:41:39 PM
  • GamblingIssues: Talkin is a winner in the Preakness today
    Today at 12:39:53 PM
  • JT: Calhoun said Calhoun likes the 12 in the thread  ngc3
    Today at 12:33:57 PM
  • Kirby's Ace: #7
    Today at 12:30:55 PM
  • Sweet: #12 Thirteen Roses 20-1 ml, my final answer  ngc3
    Today at 12:30:02 PM
  • Sweet: I'm going to figure out who you like in CD 2nd  tmbz1
    Today at 12:03:41 PM
  • Calhoun: Life's good. Wish I had strong opinion for Preakness. I made my picks but I'm dead money.Just want to get lucky. But got a firster @ Churchill.  ;D
    Today at 11:48:21 AM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal