Author Topic: Betting Half Mile Tracks  (Read 1131 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

theokodjak26

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1149
Betting Half Mile Tracks
« on: September 14, 2023, 10:54:43 AM »
Half mile racing has always been my favorite to attend. I always enjoyed all the sights, smells and the close proximity to the action. I mean without cameras how can anyone over 50 make out the horse numbers at a mile track? That being said the big negative of half mile is betting.The percentage of winning favorites has always been higher than mile tracks but now it makes betting a real bad choice. According to the USTA stats half mile favs are coming in at 47% to almost 50%. Add to that that the pools at some of these tracks are pathetically low. I believe there are two reasons for these trends. The first is the shortage of horses which leads to fields that often only have 5-6 horses. Secondly race secretaries are establishing conditions that favor the bigger trainers or just to fill a race. Whether odds on horses win or not, the number of them is much higher than what existed in the 70’s and 80’s. So between the field sizes and pools this is why the Meadowlands is a much better betting proposition than places like Yonkers, Monticello, Saratoga etc. The Meadowlands percentage of favs is approximately 10%-13% lower with much bigger pools, even with all the amateur drivers. Any thoughts?

gogasgoboom

  • Top Claimer
  • ***
  • Posts: 230
  • MAKE AMERICA GO AWAY
Re: Betting Half Mile Tracks
« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2023, 11:07:27 AM »
Biggest problem is the number of wire to wire winners. Boring. Rarely does the leader falter. I find simply playing numbers works as well as anything as the results are very post position oriented.
« Last Edit: September 14, 2023, 11:10:58 AM by gogasgoboom »
America will never be great again. The world has seen who you are.

Fuguzzi

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3104
Re: Betting Half Mile Tracks
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2023, 11:17:09 AM »
Biggest problem is the number of wire to wire winners. Boring. Rarely does the leader falter. I find simply playing numbers works as well as anything as the results are very post position oriented.
These days percentages of winners on big tracks almost the same as small. Look it up. Speed killed this game more than anything by stripping value and turning off the gambler.

 

shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • Calhoun: Senator Blutarsky  ngc3 ngc3
    Today at 09:24:17 AM
  • Trigger: We laughed about that when we spoke that night.  Ask John Frank  ngc3.  Speaking of...nice lady staying there waiting for her home to be reparied gave him her #.  Who's the man!   ;D
    December 07, 2025, 10:29:00 PM
  • Kirby's Ace: And take your nice offewrs and stick them up your azz!
    December 07, 2025, 10:21:45 PM
  • Kirby's Ace: If your name is not Paul then why did JFA address you as Paul?
    December 07, 2025, 10:20:48 PM
  • Trigger: Pacer 2 aka dwarf brain 2 and cuck 2, thanks for stopping in and deploying our emoji audience.
    December 07, 2025, 05:59:20 PM
  • Trigger: Kirby you've called me many names, Blutarsky, Generation, Paul...you said I was Mike too, that I had multiple devices posting at the same time to throw off cover...nonsense aside, I make a nice offer, and you act like you have an inflamed hemmoroid!  I guess I'll have to come there and rescue you.
    December 07, 2025, 05:35:33 PM
  • Kirby's Ace: 11.tb
    December 07, 2025, 05:18:41 PM
  • Kirby's Ace: Ohhhhh Paul...I didn't know you cared so much!
    December 07, 2025, 05:18:18 PM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal