Author Topic: What Pelling Wasn't Suppose To Be Near Horses For Awhile ?  (Read 2197 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

makingit

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 356
What Pelling Wasn't Suppose To Be Near Horses For Awhile ?
« on: December 09, 2023, 06:22:30 PM »
I see a Jack Pelling driving at Freehold today. What Pelling recently whipped a horse real bad after a race and drove it into the wall in the barn area. If it is the same one, why is he back near horses so quickly?

titans1127

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 663
Re: What Pelling Wasn't Suppose To Be Near Horses For Awhile ?
« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2023, 06:44:21 PM »
Sadly he was allowed to appeal

makingit

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 356
Re: What Pelling Wasn't Suppose To Be Near Horses For Awhile ?
« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2023, 06:54:11 PM »
Terrible but I guess that is what the rule book says.  You would think in cases like this there would be temporary restraining orders like in domestic courts where he would have to stay away from animals if there was probable cause that he attempted or injured a horse until his appeal is heard. At least we protect humans.

smokingjoe

  • Top Claimer
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
Re: What Pelling Wasn't Suppose To Be Near Horses For Awhile ?
« Reply #3 on: December 09, 2023, 07:16:18 PM »
Ironically, the horse he drove into the wall on purpose, was sold by the owner a week ago and the new trainer won with it today at Freehold 2nd race.  He's on appeal and who knows how long that wll last. I say instead of the suspension, just drive him into the wall and if he can just walk away, fine. If not, a taste fo what the poor horse felt.

dougie

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 389
Re: What Pelling Wasn't Suppose To Be Near Horses For Awhile ?
« Reply #4 on: December 09, 2023, 07:39:24 PM »
smokingjoe.....i like your idea!

seen2much

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 1305
Re: What Pelling Wasn't Suppose To Be Near Horses For Awhile ?
« Reply #5 on: December 09, 2023, 08:21:46 PM »
It seems like everyone appeals.

Generation XYZ

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3573
  • HARNESS RACING IS DEAD, CALL THE CORONER!
Re: What Pelling Wasn't Suppose To Be Near Horses For Awhile ?
« Reply #6 on: December 10, 2023, 10:52:15 AM »
Appeal is just a step in the process for the average druggy trainer. Its like repeat offenders on the streets. They use the system.
Pay to Play, Play to Win!

Parked

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2426
Re: What Pelling Wasn't Suppose To Be Near Horses For Awhile ?
« Reply #7 on: December 10, 2023, 02:02:43 PM »
Most of the appeals would stop if the fine and days were tripled if they go to court and lose. 
AND. POST every week the list of those who have a penalty under appeal.  They have to keep the crooks in the news.   
Put an * in the program behind  the trainers who are racing under appeal.. 

 

shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • Calhoun: God Bless you, Uncle Jerry. Welcome back.
    September 27, 2024, 11:34:09 AM
  • Unclejerry: Lets Move To Mohawk for final 3
    September 26, 2024, 09:52:40 PM
  • Unclejerry: R7 Flamboro another Superfecta $66.45
    September 26, 2024, 08:44:18 PM
  • Unclejerry: Uncle Jerry Gives out $115.10 Trifecta at Flamboro
    September 26, 2024, 08:07:12 PM
  • Unclejerry: Does anyone know a website where people talk and share actual bets?
    September 26, 2024, 07:57:21 PM
  • Unclejerry: Uncle Jerry just gave out a $156.20 Super in R1 at Flamboro
    September 26, 2024, 06:47:08 PM
  • London: Another fkn scumbag
    September 25, 2024, 05:31:08 PM
  • Passion: Frederick bourgault
    September 25, 2024, 04:03:04 PM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal