When arrogant, brazen trainers choose to ignore the judges and care less about the impression ... how is the obvious addressed?
Best trainers seems to turn in a 20% MAX Win % and a UDRS @ maybe, maybe .325. There are trainers that perhaps that can compete at a slightly higher level; but, when previously mediocre trainers suddenly score 3 X higher than the year in/year out best trainers .... why don't the stewards of the sport / directors of the paddock step in to address the situation? Frequent trackside bettors look over the program and if they see a high % listiing as trainer, they don't spend a minute handicapping and go straight to the window to bet on the name that shows a tripled score over the others.
Wagerers and other horsemen forced to make an attempt at betting and/or racing against others that appear to be working with an unfair advantage.
This is very bad for the sport; and, detrimental to the window action..
