Author Topic: What Pelling Wasn't Suppose To Be Near Horses For Awhile ?  (Read 3887 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

makingit

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 443
What Pelling Wasn't Suppose To Be Near Horses For Awhile ?
« on: December 09, 2023, 06:22:30 PM »
I see a Jack Pelling driving at Freehold today. What Pelling recently whipped a horse real bad after a race and drove it into the wall in the barn area. If it is the same one, why is he back near horses so quickly?

titans1127

  • Stakes Horse
  • *****
  • Posts: 802
Re: What Pelling Wasn't Suppose To Be Near Horses For Awhile ?
« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2023, 06:44:21 PM »
Sadly he was allowed to appeal

makingit

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 443
Re: What Pelling Wasn't Suppose To Be Near Horses For Awhile ?
« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2023, 06:54:11 PM »
Terrible but I guess that is what the rule book says.  You would think in cases like this there would be temporary restraining orders like in domestic courts where he would have to stay away from animals if there was probable cause that he attempted or injured a horse until his appeal is heard. At least we protect humans.

smokingjoe

  • Top Claimer
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
Re: What Pelling Wasn't Suppose To Be Near Horses For Awhile ?
« Reply #3 on: December 09, 2023, 07:16:18 PM »
Ironically, the horse he drove into the wall on purpose, was sold by the owner a week ago and the new trainer won with it today at Freehold 2nd race.  He's on appeal and who knows how long that wll last. I say instead of the suspension, just drive him into the wall and if he can just walk away, fine. If not, a taste fo what the poor horse felt.

dougie

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2034
Re: What Pelling Wasn't Suppose To Be Near Horses For Awhile ?
« Reply #4 on: December 09, 2023, 07:39:24 PM »
smokingjoe.....i like your idea!

seen2much

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2548
Re: What Pelling Wasn't Suppose To Be Near Horses For Awhile ?
« Reply #5 on: December 09, 2023, 08:21:46 PM »
It seems like everyone appeals.

Generation XYZ

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 3573
  • HARNESS RACING IS DEAD, CALL THE CORONER!
Re: What Pelling Wasn't Suppose To Be Near Horses For Awhile ?
« Reply #6 on: December 10, 2023, 10:52:15 AM »
Appeal is just a step in the process for the average druggy trainer. Its like repeat offenders on the streets. They use the system.
Pay to Play, Play to Win!

Parked

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2801
Re: What Pelling Wasn't Suppose To Be Near Horses For Awhile ?
« Reply #7 on: December 10, 2023, 02:02:43 PM »
Most of the appeals would stop if the fine and days were tripled if they go to court and lose. 
AND. POST every week the list of those who have a penalty under appeal.  They have to keep the crooks in the news.   
Put an * in the program behind  the trainers who are racing under appeal.. 

 

shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • Sweet: Bobble...I don't want to get him in trouble, I don't want to ruin his legacy.  When you say those things after a win, is a problem, tells you his mindset.  Fear and lack of confidence, horse senses and feels it.  Don't ruin that horse!
    Today at 12:45:59 AM
  • Sweet: bobble picks up $5k not a bad night for a spaced out bum  ngc3
    Today at 12:01:05 AM
  • JT: That was an easy bet across the board on him.No way he isn't at least getting 3rd
    June 13, 2026, 11:40:01 PM
  • Sweet: $20,830 place on BJ, evaporated in you pocket  ngc3
    June 13, 2026, 11:32:48 PM
  • JT: ngc3
    June 13, 2026, 11:30:15 PM
  • Sweet: Thank bobble, congrats  tmbz1 ngc3
    June 13, 2026, 11:28:49 PM
  • JT: Fuck BB paid $7.90 to place. I had $100 across the board. Got back $540 tmbz1
    June 13, 2026, 11:26:49 PM
  • Sweet: Jason Bartlett on BJ, DD on BB, leave JMacScumhole on OOMM  ngc3
    June 13, 2026, 11:25:59 PM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal