Author Topic: Harris, Pollock spent $2.5m more than the next biggest spender.....  (Read 3835 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

JL52

  • Open / FFA
  • ****
  • Posts: 371
Re: Harris, Pollock spent $2.5m more than the next biggest spender.....
« Reply #15 on: October 09, 2024, 05:02:15 PM »
In my opinion, you're better off having an overnight horse who can race at Yonkers and run 30 times a year and win $100,000 or more. Training costs are expensive, and the high-profile ones charge more. Buying yearlings is a crapshoot and an expensive one. Andrew Harris did well when his stable was overnight horses , but it's totally different training and managing young horses, some trainers do well, others, not so well..
Agree with you, GH, re racing overnights at YR, but grossing 100k probably gives you just a 15k profit, and you have to get over the hurdles of being OK’d to race there, plus competing against all the druggies.

 

shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • Ignorance Is Bliss: [link] I repeat, this is abuse.  tmbz1
    Today at 07:34:58 PM
  • Trigger: Another downgrade  ngc3
    Today at 06:57:33 PM
  • Mazola: noBALLsakit  ngc3
    Today at 06:56:16 PM
  • Trigger: Yeh Mike, that sissy noBALLsakit makes the cocksucker Kenny look like a warrior.  noBALLS, asks the forum a zillion questions and uses the phrase "mind your business".  Abortion survivor.   ;D
    Today at 06:43:45 PM
  • Trigger: Races go off on time too
    Today at 03:47:19 PM
  • Trigger: Not bad at all, BC 1st eace a 50k opt cl, 175k purse - generaous, and almost 5mil bet  tmbz1 Hi5 pool a little light with 14k.
    Today at 03:45:33 PM
  • Trigger: Nope  ngc3
    Today at 03:21:26 PM
  • Trigger: BC 2nd luve if the put the 5 behind 8,9 biugger hi5, supand tri!
    Today at 03:18:45 PM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal