Author Topic: Karl  (Read 16064 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Parked

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2800
Re: Karl
« Reply #60 on: October 20, 2024, 08:55:27 AM »
Not that I would if I had money but I would send a mare to Tactical Approach before I send one to Karl, if comparing the two of them


TA is out of a Donato Hanover mare, and he is a bigger stronger-built horse.

Having said that, I would go to Walner before anything else period.

A quick look at Friday and Saturday charts show Walner had 7 three year olds start and 4 two year olds.  All 4 fillies made the finals and 3 out of 7 colts.  One winner and all the rest were 4 th or 5 th.   We will see how thay do next week. 

Grandstand Handicapper

  • Elite
  • ******
  • Posts: 2525
  • Which wolf wins? The one you feed.
Re: Karl
« Reply #61 on: October 21, 2024, 11:41:39 AM »
Listen, Karl once again looked "ordinary" (compared to his 2yo year and expectations). People can speak to sound, not sound, bled, lasix, etc. That said, I never thought he was a "great" colt, simply because of----one, what I saw and how he did what he did. Two, I think too many people throw the word "great". Three, the word seems to be grossly overused and it applies to every leading horse of their respective class.

I am not a trainer. I don't who is on this website, but I would venture to say there is not one trainer on this site I would consider to be a better horseman than Jimmy Takter. So, if the horse is not sound, if anyone can get him right, it's Jimmy and not some poster here. I also don't suspect anyone here knows what number he bled, how long it's been going on, etc.

So, never being on the Karl or great train, and this may sound strange coming from me, but, I am not making him a toss for next week. Sure, he got lucky getting in. He would have been second to last or last had HK not broke. However, I think this is a weak crop. I think it's a bit of an inconsistent crop----in that the colts at the top of the class haven't been extremely consistent. Any one of them can break, throw in a clunker, or something of the like. I think Jimmy knows what he's dealing with and has been pointing this colt to the BC since Lexington, since he bled, etc. I think he was not all out, by design, but was used and a bit hard.

I am going to watch a lot of replays. I am going to watch what trainers really know how to peak a colt for a specific race. I will be at training centers this week watching whoever and whatever I can, and get as much information on the colts I can't or don't see (although I won't get any reports from Takter's farm, LOL). I did all of this for the KY Futurity, and just like I did in Lexington, I am going to be prepared, very prepared, so that in case I see something on the track and on the board, I can strike. I saw what I saw for the Futurity, with several minutes to post, and I fired away, and it paid off.....big time, LOL. But, that aside, I am not making Karl an automatic toss. Not by any means.

 

shout out

Refresh History
  • Sound off !
  • Sweet: Slowest Preakness in 75 years, since Hill Prince, 1950.
    Today at 08:21:24 PM
  • Sweet: Racing Gods ask....Mohawk 5th, let the 2&5 duke it out and then Daya clean their clocks.  One less sub $10 pick 5 payoff too  ngc3 Thank you!  ;D
    Today at 08:10:17 PM
  • WinOutRacin: Oosting
    Today at 07:14:47 PM
  • ec: Good to see Napoleon Solo get back in to the groove
    Today at 07:14:44 PM
  • Sweet: Taj and Great White seriously....fan clubs  ngc3 let's never say there's no fans of at least t-bred racing, they blew tens of millions on a cow and a whale, still lovely horses though  ;D
    Today at 07:12:37 PM
  • Sweet: Uh oh, I'm now seeing Napoleon Solo and Incredibolt coming for him....I need anti-pschotic meds  ngc3
    Today at 12:50:26 PM
  • Sweet: I was too busy study the race while he posted it 20 min before  ngc3
    Today at 12:41:39 PM
  • GamblingIssues: Talkin is a winner in the Preakness today
    Today at 12:39:53 PM
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal