0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
WHEN THE JEW STARTED TAKING PUBLIC MONEY FROM THE GUBMINT FOR PURSES HE SHOULD LOSE THE RIGHT TO BE THE PICK AND CHOOSE JEW. HE IS DISCRIMINATING AGAINST MR KAP and who is the racist?I HOPE THE COURT AND KAP SINGH BUSTS A CAP IN THE JEWS ASSI ALWAYS KNEW JEFF THE JEW WAS A RACIST MOTHER FUCKFELLOW OWNERS ARE ON YOUR SIDE MR SINGH. WE NEED THIS RACIST BASTARD OUT OF THE TRACK OWNER BUSINESS
and who is the racist?
Don't speak for me Bernie, i'm not.
I SOMETIMES READ THE VARIETY OF POST AND TRY TO UNDERSTAND HOW ANYONE CAN IN FACT MAKE THE STATEMENTS THAT ARE MADE. DO YOU REALIZE HOW MANY INNOCENT LAW ABIDING HORSEMAN AND OWNERS CANNOT RACE DUE TO SOMETHING SO MINOR AS UNPAID FINANCIAL ALLEGATIONS? THE USTA / STATES REQUIRE A RULE CALLED "FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY." TRUTHFULLY, THESE FOLKS CANNOT PAY THEIR BILLS BUT ARE TRYING TO EARN A LIVING FOR THEIR FAMILIES BUT YET MANY USE 'PEDS' TO ENHANCE THEIR HORSES PERFORMANCE AT THE COST OF THE HONEST HORSEMAN TRYING TO EARN A LIVING.NOW I SEE THE DEFENSE THAT IT IS OK TO USE DRUGS AND /OR KNOWINGLY USE A TRAINER THAT DOES. THIS IS ABSURD. THERE IS A LAW THAT MANY OF YOU ARE NOT AWARE BUT CLEARLY IS PART OF THIS CASE:"KNOWINGLY AND UNKNOWINGLY" YOU ARE GUILTY IF ASSOCIATED WITH ANYONE BREAKING THE LAW. THE FEDERAL PRISIONS ARE FULL OF DOCTORS AND OTHER PROFESSIONALS THAT PARTICIPATED IN CRIMES " KNOWINGLY OR UNKNOWINGLY" AND WERE FIRST TIME OFFENDERS WITHOUT A RECORD EVEN THOUGH THEY WERE UNAWARE THAT THEY DID NOT COMMIT A CRIME.ANYONE WHO PARTICIPATED IN CRIMINAL ACTIVITY "KNOWINGLY OR UNKNOWINGLY" CAN BE CONVICTED OF A FELONY AND END UP IN A FEDERAL PRISION. IT DOES NOT MATTER IF YOU ARE RICH OR POOR. I BELIEVE THE SENTENCES WILL BE LIGHTER THAT EXPECTED SINCE THE FIRST INDICTMENT WAS PRESENTED AND THEN THE SUPERCEDING INDICTMENT EXCLUDED SEVERAL NAMES INCLUDING THOSE IN THE STANDARDBRED INDUSTRY. THESE ARE THE FOLKS THAT ROLLED FIRST AND DID A PLEA DEAL WITH THE PROSECUTORS. THAT DOES NOT SAY THEY DID NOT DO THE CRIME BUT IT SAYS THEY TOOK A PLEA AND BECAME AN INFORMANT FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO SAVE THEIRSELF AT THE EXPENSE OF OTHERS. THE TRUTH IS THEY STILL COMMITTED THE CRIME BUT WILL NOT BE HELD LIABLE. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OPERATES ON THIS SYSTEM-----INFORMANTS.I ALSO BELIEVE THAT THAT THE PANDEMIC WILL SAVE SO MANY IN THIS CASE DUE TO OTHER POLITICAL ISSUES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NY. THE SENTENCES AND OUTCOME OF THIS CASE WILL NOT BE WHAT EVERYONE THOUGHT DUE TO THE COVID 19 DISASTER. THERE ARE OTHER ISSUES PENDING.THEREFORE, MR. GURAL DOES IN FACT HAVE THE RIGHT TO EXCLUDE ANYONE AND IN FACT ANYONE THAT PARTICIPATED "KNOWINGLY OR UNKNOWINGLY" COULD BE CHARGED AND INCLUDED IN ANY INDICTMENT. THE ARGUMENT I DID NOT KNOW DOES NOT HOLD WATER EVEN IF THEY DID NOT KNOW. THAT IS IRRELAVANT. THEY PARTICIPATED AND BENEFITTED FROM THE CRIMES AND TRUTHFULLY THERE WERE VICTIMS AND THEREFORE CRIMES WERE COMMITTED AND I AM SHOCKED THAT THE PROSECUTORS DID NOT PURSUE THIS AVENUE TO TRULY GO AFTER ADDITIONAL PARTICIPANTS IN THESE CRIMES.NO ONE SHOULD BE GIVEN A COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN ANY ACTIVITY BUT HOW HYPOCRITICAL IS IT THAT ANYONE THAT DOES NOT PAY A $25 INVOICE CAN BE EXCLUDED FROM ANY TRACK BUT THEIR ARE NO COMPLAINTS WHEN SO MANY CANNOT COMPETE AGAINST THE TRAINERS THAT ROUTINELY USE PEDS. THE HONEST HORSEMAN COULD START A CLASS ACTION CIVIL SUIT AGAINST ALL OF THE NAMED HORSEMAN AND EVERY OWNER THAT BENEFITTED FROM THE CRIMES OF THE INDICTED AND THIS WOULD GO A LONG WAY IN FEDERAL COURT. THIS IS THE WAY TO FIGHT THE PED EPIDEMIC. THE COST TO FIGHT THIS WOULD LEVEL THE PLAYING FIELD AND THE FEDS HAVE SPENT A FORTUNEE TO GET THE INDICTMENTS THIS FAR. USE THIS INFO TO HOLD THE PARTIES REPONSIBLE!"KNOWINGLY OR UNKNOWINGLY" YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS!!!!
My question is how can he hold owners responsible for using Allard for winter training. When he has not been found guilty yet. But has no problem with horses trained by Steve Elliot who is on a 10 year suspension from Gurals jurisdiction
REMEMBER THE LAW IS CLEAR "KNOWINGLY OR UNKNOWINGLY!" THIS MEANS THAT EVEN IF YOU ARE NOT AWARE A CRIME IS BEING COMMITTED AND YOU ARE A PARTICIPANT YOU CAN IN FACT BE CHARGED AND CONVICTED. ANY OWNER THAT "KNOWINGLY OR UNKNOWINGLY" PARTICIPATED IN THE PED SCHEME TO DEFRAUD COULD BE CHARGED AND CONVICTED.IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE PARTIES KNOW MORE OF THE END GOAL HERE THAN IS IN THE INDICTMENT OR THE SUPERCEDING INDICTMENT. I FIND IT INTERESTING THAT THERE ARE SEVERAL NAMES THAT WERE LEFT OFF THE SUPERCEDING INDICTMENT WHICH COULD INDICATE THEY TURNED INFORMANT AND WILL TESTIFY FOR THE GOVERNMENT. IF SO, THESE WITNESSES COULD INCRIMINATE ADDITIONAL PARTIES INCLUDING COLLATERAL PARTICIPANTS WHO MAY CLAIM THEY WERE UNAWARE OF ANY PED USES.BUT REMEMBER "KNOWINGLY OR UNKNOWINGLY!"COULD GET INTERESTING BUT IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE COVID PANDEMIC HELPED SO MANY AS THE GOVERNMENT IS EXTREMELY INVOLVED IN SO MANY CASES AND INVESTIGATIONS THAT WERE DELAYED AND I WOULD GUESS THERE MAY BE A MAN POWER SHORTGAGE AS WELL.TIME WILL TELL.
