0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Your logic is horribly flawed. The horse tested at 17Pg/Ml. Based on your theory of 30,000 Ml in a horse the total level would be 510,000 Pg in the horses system
does ANYONE ANYWHERE believe that 0.0005mg has any effect on a horse-ie affect his performance?? The clearance levels are set too low IMHOIll wait.
Cop stops me… you were going 55 in a 40 zone. I tell him this a straight road with no houses within 3 miles and the speed limit should be 55. Sorry , its the law, here is the ticket. Tell the judge the same thing. Sorry its the law, 3 points, $100 fine and $100 surcharge. ITS THE LAW, STAY THE HELL AWAY FROM YOUR HORSES WITH THIS STUFF
It's like being a little bit pregnant. Right?
No--wrong-Betamethasone IS allowed---its not 0-- levels above 5pg/ml-ie an "overage" will result in a positive.Officials and racing administrators are under the gun to outlaw "cheats" to improve integrity of racing and make bettors belive everything is on the up and up.They cant catch the real cheats-that is the chemists in the game--you need the FBI for that.So whats happening-they take therapeutic drugs that they know are being used extensively and easy to test for-make levels insanely LOW-and make a huge fanfare when they catch someone--preferably someone like Baffert--much publicity--OR they take a poor trainer and throw the book at him make him a "scapegoat"--so people think that they are doing a great job.The general public--including many on this site-dont seem to make a distinction between a therapeutic drug-used to make horses healthier-OR a performance enhancer like EPO-or what the indicted were using --to cheat.Cant blame the public-they are not scientists--all they hear is the word "drug" and the haters are off to the races. This is how the officials get away with this BS dupe the public while the real cheats remain at large -which needs to end ASAP. Make "overages" sensible to allow honest trainers do their job- and let the FBI go after the cheats. Laboratories --are secondary as the drug cheats over the last 100 or more years--are always a step ahead.
I'm no scientist.
Bond: Your logic and examples makes sense, but I'm no scientist. You have to understand that this place is comprised of mostly haters, so logic does not really play into most subjects.It is a lot like arguing politics. People have their minds made up, and reasoning is not a factor.Thanks for your perspective.
Oh please. "overages""drug""scapegoat" "cheats" You try to turn those words into a kinda, sorta, no biggie deal slang in order to rationalize, excuse and normalize bad actions. You claim you know better than me. Trust me, I know FAR more about this than you. Right. Now, please, Fuck all the way off.
Of the other few hundred horses that race on that day across the country, how many of them came up positive? I totally agree with your point in assessing the value of a extremely low count of a therapeutic overage. It is akin to a speeding ticket when compared to the stuff the others are under criminal indictment for. But, if you get enough speeding tickets, like Baffert, you must be dealt a penalty that will sway your current practices. We must not allow ones influence and power to give them their own set of rules. So if these two pushed the envelope and got snagged by the hair on their ass, they should be given a penalty that will entice them too, to rethink their program.Hair on their ass The threshold is 5 they had 67 and 68. Its a shell game of what they are testing for and the clam was still in the shell…. This therapeutic stuff is crap. Either they are loaded or they aren’t.
Can you explain the logic in "zero tolerance" from Jeff Gural regarding Lou Pena's non banned race day meds overages and today's 100% tolerance when his own trainers get popped?