Dexter Dunn Ari Ferrari

[Senator Blutarsky]

Not falling for it Senator.  You better than anybody knows that no one really wins a fight but it's fun trying.

You have an issue, I found the most direct way for you to follow through and MAKE YOUR VOICE AND FEELINGS MATTER! Hoping you'd follow through there and advise us here!

You don't want to call him, just BITCH & COMPLAIN, got it!!!

It's now on me, you can't email the dude, hey I heard you say this? did you ever consider that, I got 20 years on ya maybe we can chat for 5 minutes, I'm a racing fan.......No just the cop-out and new blame!

Kooter, play with the retarded kiddy pussies, when you're tired of that and ready to engage....you know what I like, INTELLIGENCE and FUN and RACING OPPORTUNITIES - or - to BANG AWAY! 

[Senator Blutarsky]

Not falling for it Senator.  You better than anybody knows that no one really wins a fight but it's fun trying.

Part 2:

If a 77 yo walked up and punched me, I'd ask them if they were done and go about my business.  I respect and protect vulnerable, seniors especially those that built this country.  After our tit for tat that ended, we introduced ourselves.  You saying that to me means you want to fight, or try to make it look like I want to.  For that, respectfully, go fuck yourself! 

You start the day with telling everyone you laugh at others pain and misery, enjoy their bad beat stories.

You find the dude, MikeAnt who is so volatile I call him in humor a Hate Crime Machine here.  You tell him you miss him not winding up he's too mild.  Seeking to instigate him.

Look at your posts today bro, everyone can, you're fooling no one.

And no one wins a fight?, fights should be avoided and peace and or avoidance sought sure.  There are billions of people in history who instigated fights, and their graves don't need to say loser. 

[Senator Blutarsky]

Not falling for it Senator.  You better than anybody knows that no one really wins a fight but it's fun trying.

Part III

If you're not well, maybe talk to someone.  I doubt I'll make it to 77, lifestyle, desire, but you're there, if you embrace and enjoy life and something is wrong, take care of it!

Better to have fun and a tit 4 tat mixed in then poof you're gone, I told MikeAnt similar, I said better here calling me and the rest of the dudes "niggers" and "kikes", and wishing us disease and death, sex with animals, our children raped then saying it out there in world and getting murdered.  His bs on the street he'd be an odds on favorite in the hood to be chalk outlined in 0.1 seconds!     

[bestbetter]

Are you guys new to the game?

[HornbyDuke]

Lol. 2/5s of second into race everyone watching knew far and away best horse in race was doa. My thought was why isnt dd on gate, lol and then he immediately veered left. Lol. Looked like training mile to me. But given DD histiry (Frankie Dettori equivelent in standardbreds) would not surprise me if dd had a ticket on  p5. Its why when racing was more concerned about integrity of sport it was reluctant to have these huge payoff pools.

Amusing that best jockey in thoroughbreds over last 20 yrs and same but driver in standardbreds have character questions involving gambling/race fixing. Might give intelligent people a pause; not a ploptart like me though. Im in this friday with both fists. Lol

[Senator Blutarsky]

Are you guys new to the game?

Yes I'm very new, a babe to the game, and after my initial lucky win, all my horses & bets lose.  Throwing more and more money into bets doesn't work, It's getting worst.

Could you help me pleeeeeease bestbetter ?  You are the perfect person to ask.  Who's cock do I have to suck to buy a winner, and please teach me how!   

[Senator Blutarsky]

Lol. 2/5s of second into race everyone watching knew far and away best horse in race was doa. My thought was why isnt dd on gate, lol and then he immediately veered left. Lol. Looked like training mile to me. But given DD histiry (Frankie Dettori equivelent in standardbreds) would not surprise me if dd had a ticket on  p5. Its why when racing was more concerned about integrity of sport it was reluctant to have these huge payoff pools.

Amusing that best jockey in thoroughbreds over last 20 yrs and same but driver in standardbreds have character questions involving gambling/race fixing. Might give intelligent people a pause; not a ploptart like me though. Im in this friday with both fists. Lol

At the end of last week I thought I'd finding you standing on all those losing tickets, then jumping off them and swinging from a tree...a nice win on Mage and you're rocking into his week laughing about Frankie Dettori, pick 5 conspiracies, bro, you and your 2 fists are revitalized, GREAT to SEE, and they're ready to fist fuck fight the next winners out of someones ass!   

[FirstUpFrom8Hole]

The long stretch does take acclimating to, it’s a real thing. Reading way too much into it.

True. But the hardest one I've ever had to try to gauge was Woodbine. I swear it seems like it takes an hour from the turn to reach the finish. Especially in a headwind and it's 15 below. 

[pocketrocketwinner]

They are really trying to tap into the tbred gamblers by sharing national TV time with them at night. Imagine a tbred gambler dabbles into M1 and sees that Dexter drive. Win or lose, thay person is never coming back to harness. Then that person tells all his acquaintances about how stupid people much be to bet harness.

[kooter for hipin]

You have an issue, I found the most direct way for you to follow through and MAKE YOUR VOICE AND FEELINGS MATTER! Hoping you'd follow through there and advise us here!

You don't want to call him, just BITCH & COMPLAIN, got it!!!

It's now on me, you can't email the dude, hey I heard you say this? did you ever consider that, I got 20 years on ya maybe we can chat for 5 minutes, I'm a racing fan.......No just the cop-out and new blame!

Kooter, play with the retarded kiddy pussies, when you're tired of that and ready to engage....you know what I like, INTELLIGENCE and FUN and RACING OPPORTUNITIES - or - to BANG AWAY! 

"Lend me your ear and I'll sing you a song and I will try not to sing out of key"

[Senator Blutarsky]

"Lend me your ear and I'll sing you a song and I will try not to sing out of key"

Nice Beatles song, thanks.....Joe Cocker's version too...he's dead unfortunately, what I do know, the very last thing he did before he died, was watch "Grumpy Old Men" from his hospital bed.  The cigarette monster got him, he's coming for me too!   

[kooter for hipin]

Nice Beatles song, thanks.....Joe Cocker's version too...he's dead unfortunately, what I do know, the very last thing he did before he died, was watch "Grumpy Old Men" from his hospital bed.  The cigarette monster got him, he's coming for me too!   

Thanks for the appreciation.

[pickfourny]

It's an old familiar tale; the pari-mutuel industry model has two distinct user groups which causes a lot of conflict between the two. In a typical retail business, something is supplied something is bought. The buyer/user, if he likes it, buys it again, if he doesn't then fuck the supplier. Both parties understand the ramifications. In the casino business (slots, roulette) the buyer/user/gambler knows the score going in. Come in here and play, you may win big, but the odds are already stacked against you before you start; Roulette, a 36:1 payment on a straight hit against natural odds that should pay 38:1. Huge casino edge; the Slots, perhaps a $0.90 return on every $1 wagered. Huge casino edge. No mystery.

Racing, different freakin business model altogether. The supplier/horseman/owner does what's best for his own interest without regard to the end user/gambler (blast him, take him back, take him around the track and let's drop money off the last 5, training trip only he needs it, stay in the NW1 2 class so let's not win, etc etc etc). If you're a horseman, owner, it makes sense. Do what's best for the horse if we have a long-term plan or trying to maximize a condition for as much money as you can.  A very old story. Has any trainer ever said to a driver, "hey we're not ready or I'd love to stay in the NW1 class, or we're training for next week's big race, but fuck it, make sure you give that poor schmuck gambler a fair shake and try to win no matter what the cost."

Conversely the user/gambler entering a gaming establishment expects a fair race each time; simply that the drivers are trying on the horses that they drive without some predesignated agenda.  That expectation is absolutely fair and deserved as the product being offered is a gambling product for use, and that the wheel simply isn't tilted before you play (discounting the 20-30% take out before you start). Sadly, it's a naive expectation.

Ultimately, it's one industry with the two distinct participant groups that have entirely different business agendas. It's not sustainable. Is it any wonder the gamblers have left?

[kooter for hipin]

It's an old familiar tale; the pari-mutuel industry model has two distinct user groups which causes a lot of conflict between the two. In a typical retail business, something is supplied something is bought. The buyer/user, if he likes it, buys it again, if he doesn't then fuck the supplier. Both parties understand the ramifications. In the casino business (slots, roulette) the buyer/user/gambler knows the score going in. Come in here and play, you may win big, but the odds are already stacked against you before you start; Roulette, a 36:1 payment on a straight hit against natural odds that should pay 38:1. Huge casino edge; the Slots, perhaps a $0.90 return on every $1 wagered. Huge casino edge. No mystery.

Racing, different freakin business model altogether. The supplier/horseman/owner does what's best for his own interest without regard to the end user/gambler (blast him, take him back, take him around the track and let's drop money off the last 5, training trip only he needs it, stay in the NW1 2 class so let's not win, etc etc etc). If you're a horseman, owner, it makes sense. Do what's best for the horse if we have a long-term plan or trying to maximize a condition for as much money as you can.  A very old story. Has any trainer ever said to a driver, "hey we're not ready or I'd love to stay in the NW1 class, or we're training for next week's big race, but fuck it, make sure you give that poor schmuck gambler a fair shake and try to win no matter what the cost."

Conversely the user/gambler entering a gaming establishment expects a fair race each time; simply that the drivers are trying on the horses that they drive without some predesignated agenda.  That expectation is absolutely fair and deserved as the product being offered is a gambling product for use, and that the wheel simply isn't tilted before you play (discounting the 20-30% take out before you start). Sadly, it's a naive expectation.

Ultimately, it's one industry with the two distinct participant groups that have entirely different business agendas. It's not sustainable. Is it any wonder the gamblers have left?

No!

[Senator Blutarsky]

It's an old familiar tale; the pari-mutuel industry model has two distinct user groups which causes a lot of conflict between the two. In a typical retail business, something is supplied something is bought. The buyer/user, if he likes it, buys it again, if he doesn't then fuck the supplier. Both parties understand the ramifications. In the casino business (slots, roulette) the buyer/user/gambler knows the score going in. Come in here and play, you may win big, but the odds are already stacked against you before you start; Roulette, a 36:1 payment on a straight hit against natural odds that should pay 38:1. Huge casino edge; the Slots, perhaps a $0.90 return on every $1 wagered. Huge casino edge. No mystery.

Racing, different freakin business model altogether. The supplier/horseman/owner does what's best for his own interest without regard to the end user/gambler (blast him, take him back, take him around the track and let's drop money off the last 5, training trip only he needs it, stay in the NW1 2 class so let's not win, etc etc etc). If you're a horseman, owner, it makes sense. Do what's best for the horse if we have a long-term plan or trying to maximize a condition for as much money as you can.  A very old story. Has any trainer ever said to a driver, "hey we're not ready or I'd love to stay in the NW1 class, or we're training for next week's big race, but fuck it, make sure you give that poor schmuck gambler a fair shake and try to win no matter what the cost."

Conversely the user/gambler entering a gaming establishment expects a fair race each time; simply that the drivers are trying on the horses that they drive without some predesignated agenda.  That expectation is absolutely fair and deserved as the product being offered is a gambling product for use, and that the wheel simply isn't tilted before you play (discounting the 20-30% take out before you start). Sadly, it's a naive expectation.

Ultimately, it's one industry with the two distinct participant groups that have entirely different business agendas. It's not sustainable. Is it any wonder the gamblers have left?

OM Lord, reading that was a fucking Unabomber type manifesto, that required deep focus, ibuprofen before and after.  Lay off the drugs and or get a mental health check-up please!  I'm sending you a bill!