0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Weather at Poconos and Flamboro looks beautiful as in tracks should be FAST!The 15 stakes races, many are baby monsters you're following and mentioned to me and the FORUM, my wagers....get to it you APES :Poco(645pm) 4. 13/13/67/267 tri and sup6. 1/7/234/234 ex strt, tri and sup, p47. 8/7/125/125 ex strt tri and sup,8. 3/16/16/A ex strt, tri and sup, p5 (ALL in the 11th)9. 36, w6, exx, 36/36/A tri, p3 (ALL in the 11th)10. 6/13/13/45 tri and sup11.--------don't like race--------12. 3/2/156/156 ex strt, tri and sup13. -------don't like race----------Blue was in the wrong place didn't matter, typo. Exs, tris, sup very healthy enough to be way ahead for the day, p3, p5 minor spoils chalk, 3 left at FLAM!Flam(655pm) 1. Young trotters, breakers, little to no 1/2 track exp.--dlr---3. Young trotters, breakers, little to no 1/2 track exp.---dlr---5. Young trotters, breakers, little to no 1/2 track exp.---dlr---(910pm) 7. W9 9. 5/34/34/26 tri and sup, p3 (ALL in the 11th)10. 4/256810 ex, tri, hi5VGL to EV1! Same warning to anyone that backs these wagers, proceed with extreme caution, based on my personal pps lately - maybe get your head checked first!
CLASSIC TIGHT FIRST TURN 1/2 MILE FLAMBORO HIJINCKS RACE 10 $262gs JURAVINSKI FEATURE!!!!!AE #10 RON phil hudon drew in to post 3 (for big pre-race scratch of heavy Gingras/Burke fave #3 BYMISSAL) and proceeded to tough half-mile first turn 'slide under' Roy co-fave #4 on that opening turn, who in turn forced new Gingras/Burke fave #5 BIRTHDAY out and another solid u.s. choice #6 PLEASELETMEKNOW wider..and then, 15" later, down the back first time, Hudon and RON continued his Canadian assault on Burke fave, earning his 'Intereference infractions' by backing right back into him, before pulling into rail and forcing another capable entry, Mcclure #2, to put on the brakes. Hudon and #10 finished 5th, but understandably came down. And Id guess a fine/suspension coming too.TAKE A LOOK AT THAT REPLAY..if i didnt know better, id swear Hudon's treatment of #5 gingras/burke horse was deliberate.Anyway, the 4 and 5 faves missed hi 5 ticket, with 3rd choice, Trevor Henry FOUREVER BOY winning with the rail horse, a horse Dunn qualified last week.Both Alexander trainees hit top 5 (2nd dh and 4th)NO WINNERS 20 CENT HI 5 $11,000 carried over to the night's r12 hi5 finale and a sizeable payoff with Travis Cullen's #2 7-1 getting it done. A fair, trot heavy show on the tight half mile..and thats all you can ask
Blanked out at FLAM, Canada and I are going through some rough times atm. Great day overall with solid cold, small combo - decent payouts on what I hit!Gambling losses, down, from just under $5k, to just over $3k for the last 46 days. Appreciation to Horseplop and all the Bros, your touted horses helped me out today, solid betting strategy, balls to the wall - works on my end!
Degenerates that play as many races as you seem to, NEVER show a monthly profit, much less a yearly profit. It's pretty simple, degenerates want action and may win daily, but lose weekly, monthly and yearly. Being an uneducated degenerate many years ago led to mid five figure yearly losses year after year. Learning the game, when to fire big and when to just watch is the ultimate key. I could be wrong, but everything about you screams degenerate and one can try a hundred different wagering systems and modalities, but the more races one plays, the greater the likelyhood that ROI continues to drop. I never post plays, because quite simply, I am playing against every other person who bets into pools. Pools are small enough as it is at many harness tracks. When making a handful of large bets a week, into these pools, the last thing one wants is a touted horse getting extra cash infused and thus dropping the price. This forum is full of classic degenerates and has been for many years. A real handicapper is never a degenerate, but more importantly, never chases losses and never lets emotions get the best of them.
I turn a profit, have the records and tax returns to prove it. I felt burn out the last 2 months, and I possibly chose wrongly to work through it, overcome it.You know nothing about me, and you're comparing me to other people, calling me a degenerate, quite frankly if I was retired I wouldn't gamble - but for me it is better than working for other people, running a biz and dealing with people, and can operate from home. I do agree with betting less races, but a bunch of horses landed that I've been following in those cards.You, just an ignorant asshole which is quite obvious from your post that navigates away from opinion in to a personal attack on someone you don't know, me!
You are a long term winner and are on here talking about finding the shortest fields to bet each day. I dont believe that dynamic could ever work. Nobody without the highest of high rebates could seek out small fields and profit long term.
Do you and the people who keep commenting understand I was burnt out and seeking a strategy with small fields, and yes it makes mathematical sense, if you bet say a straight 1235 eliminate the 4 and if it comes in have a cold tri and sup if that type betting is allowed and some tracks it is!If it pays $5 on the super for every base .10 is 50-1 odds on your investing / roi, on a tri say it paid $13 for every base .50 bet it is 26-1!Now shut the fuck up until you are thoroughly reading and using math proficiently! Don't do it for you, encourage others not too, great!
No, there is no math you could ever dream up that says betting short fields (no matter your backwards logic) is sensibleHey, I'm just trying to help you cause I know your stratwgy is absolutely wring. It's not cool, to me, to see people advocate for short fields. But I'll go back to shutting the fuck up and let you continue on your way.
I turn a profit, have the records and tax returns to prove it. I felt burn out the last 2 months, and I possibly chose wrongly to work through it, overcome it.You know nothing about me, and you're comparing me to other people, calling me a degenerate, quite frankly if I was retired I wouldn't gamble - but for me it is better than working for other people, running a biz and dealing with people, and can operate from home. I do agree with betting less races, but a bunch of horses landed that I've been following in those cards.You, just an ignorant asshole which is quite obvious from your post that navigates away from opinion in to a personal attack on someone you don't know, me! Degenerates also have a habit of yelling and screaming at the wind. I said I could be wrong, but the response confirms my original thoughts 100%. But if you ever want to turn it around, stop kidding yourself with idle bravado about tax records and other nonsense. There is not a single person on this site, nor has there ever been, that does this for a living, turning a profit as a livable wage, instead of "working" a real job and posts like you do. Zero, none, nada. I actually for bad for dudes like you, screaming at the wind all these years later, who actually think people will believe they play horses for a living and turn a profit.
