0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
The over looked question here is , what vet is giving Virgil a Lasix slip for a horse that’s not bleeding . The industry thinks we don’t need HISA.
How many times have you had people tell you that they felt sick, thought there was something seriously wrong with them, went to the ER and were told that they were dehydrated and given IVs? We give our horse up to 10ccs of lasix four hours before they race, withdraw their water, dehydrate them and then expect them to give us maximum performance. Something about that just doesn't make sense to me but what do I know?
The main reason Lasix is used is to eliminate evidence. For example..Take 2 horses..1 on Lasix and 1 not. Give both a 10cc shot of Bute 24 hours before race. After 12 hours, the Bute leaves the blood and collects in the bladder for elimination. The horse given Lasix eliminates the Bute by urinating unnaturally gallons and gallons of liquid while the non lasix horse doesn't. After race when urine is tested on both these horses, the odds of Bute in the sample of Lasix horse is minute while the non lasix sample is questionable. That is why all trainers get their horse on the Lasix list. They can now give drugs closer than the non Lasix horse leading up to a race. Does it make a difference? Apparently many believe it does.
Have you taken into consideration that a good amount of horses don’t end up pissing in the spit box ?
Not to be a jerk, but what do you call a "good amount"?5% to 10%?10% to 20%?More or less?