0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.
If someone wants to tell me that a powerful individual, an owner, was able to maneuver and get themselves out of trouble, I can certainly say that's possible, even feasible. I don't take it as fact without proof, but I couldn't care less. Jason Servis and Jorge Navarro were two of the biggest names at the time in the t-bred industry. They won the biggest races in the sport, in the world! At the end of the day, they both went to jail.Now, Casie, who is Canadian, either as an owner or as a trainer, is guilty-----just like Servis and Navarro----and she got off? With a warning, a strongly-suggested or forced step-back or retirement? She went from training racehorses to training babies. Went from training babies to breaking them (and let's not forget owning them) and sending them to other trainers. And that's how she got off? That's the theory-----sorry, I mean "fact"-----that people are putting forth has facts?
That being said what is your opinion on how she was with Surick, Oaks, and Navarro and didn't get questioned?
Sorry Grandstand but you are making to much sense in this thread. Please don't ruin a good fictional story. Thanks
It is a FACT that the FBI will make "deals" if you provide them with information leading to the indictment of individuals, they are most concerned with, or those under observation who require more evidence for conviction. Given Casie's close association with Navarro, Surick, and Co., it may have been her decision to become an informant, this could explain why she was not charged.My question which no one has asked--is how did Suricks right hand man, best friend-Joe Bongiorno--get a walk?Does it sound feasible that he knew 0 about all of Suricks activities??